NDP tables its own Afghanistan motion

April 25, 2007 at 1:07 pm 2 comments

Confusion seems to be widespread amongst progressives today with the media reports saying that “The NDP voted with the Conservatives” to defeat the Liberal motion on Afghanistan.  This story is still unfolding – today the NDP put forward its own motion for debate on Thursday.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
APRIL 25, 2007

THE WRONG MISSION IN 2009 IS THE WRONG MISSION IN 2007: NDP NDP tables opposition motion for safe and immediate withdrawal from Afghan combat role

OTTAWA – The NDP tabled a motion today to put an end to the counter-insurgency Afghanistan mission that the Liberals, Conservatives and Bloc Québécois want to last until 2009.

“The NDP motion, to be debated Thursday and voted on Monday, calls for an immediate safe and secure withdrawal of our troops from the counter-insurgency mission and to focus our assistance, not through counter-insurgency but through development and aid,” said NDP Leader Jack Layton.  “Both Liberals and Conservatives admit that the conflict in Afghanistan won’t be won militarily. We believe that two more years of participating in the wrong mission for Canada is two years too long.”

The NDP motion is consistent with the party’s position since the counter-insurgency mission began, unlike Liberal leader Stéphane Dion’s recent flip-flop on the issue.

“One year ago, Stéphane Dion voted against extending the mission in Afghanistan, on Tuesday he voted to extend it until 2009,” said Layton. “NDP MPs take their responsibility as parliamentarians very seriously when we put young women and men in harm’s way. The question for the Liberals is simple:
If the mission is wrong for Canada, why are they asking our brave men and women to participate in it for two more years?”

The NDP’s motion reiterates the NDP’s support for Canadian troops and calls on Canada to focus its efforts in assisting the people of Afghanistan by re-doubling its commitment to reconstruction and development. 

-30-
The wording of the motion:

(1) all Members of this House, whatever their disagreements about the mission in Afghanistan, support the courageous men and women of the Canadian Forces; (2) the government has admitted that the situation in Afghanistan can not be won militarily; (3) the current counter-insurgency mission is not the right mission for Canada; (4) the government has neither defined what ‘victory’ would be, nor developed an exit strategy from this counter-insurgency mission; therefore this House condemns this government and calls for it to immediately notify NATO of our intention to begin withdrawing Canadian Forces now in a safe and secure manner from the counter-insurgency mission in Afghanistan; and calls for Canada to focus its efforts to assist the people of Afghanistan on a diplomatic solution, and re-double its commitment to reconstruction and development.

Steve

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Steven Staples.

What was Stéphane Dion thinking? Time to show real leadership

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. kneu  |  April 27, 2007 at 10:26 am

    All NATO countries should be focused on assisting the Afghan people with a diplomatic solution because they are there now. In my opinion they should never have gone there at the USA’s bidding in the first place!

    This only shows how US controlled ALL countries still are. I don’t think Canada needs to be in NATO let alone Afghanistan! Had 9/11 happened in Canada no one would have come to our assistance to take on Afghanistan. Most NATO countries don’t want to be there for the USA so don’t for a minute think they would have come running for us, afterall war is nothing but a racket and Canada doesn’t have enough of a population to make us a big enough spender for anyone to come to our aid.

    Reply
  • 2. verbena19  |  April 30, 2007 at 12:26 am

    9/11 was merely the excuse. The US had plans for Afghanistan prior to that tragedy. The Afghan ‘mission’ can not be won militarily. The Afghan people can be helped with reconstruction aid peacebuilding and diplomacy. Military operations further alienate the people at the cost of innocent lives.

    I agree with you, kneu, that war is a racket, with billions of dollars invested, which is keeping a few people obscenely rich at the cost of the poor whose lives are expendable. That includes the lives of soldiers.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Recent Posts

Feeds

Blog Stats

  • 27,114 hits

%d bloggers like this: